How Did Ali Ibn Abi Talha Narrate from Ibn Abbas(ra)?

Welcome to Ahmadi Answers

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community is the only Islamic organization to believe that the long-awaited Messiah has come in the person of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad(as) (1835-1908) of Qadian. Ahmad(as) claimed to be the metaphorical second coming of Jesus(as) of Nazareth and the divine guide, whose advent was foretold by the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad(saw). We believe that according to the Qur’an and the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad(saw) it is clear that the latter day messiah would be an imam from amongst the Muslims. Ahmadiyya Muslim Community believes that God sent Ahmad(as), like Jesus(as), to end religious wars, condemn bloodshed and re-institute morality, justice and peace. Ahmad(as)’s advent has brought about an unprecedented era of Islamic revival. He divested Islam of fanatical beliefs and practices by vigorously championing Islam’s true and essential teachings.

The non Ahmadis state imam Bukhari did not give the sanad of inni mutawaffika mumeetooka. This trick might work against people who are unaware of what Ahadith or sayings are. This is used as a betrayal. Ulama read these books and read tafseer and they should know the truth rather then use this allegation. Hazrat Imam Bukhari(Ra) stated things of many sahaba and tabieen and never gave sanad of any of them. Does this mean they are fabricated? Of course not. Read the sharah of Sahih Bukhari. It states that if Imam Bukhari states the statements of Sahaba or tabieen and does not give the sanad, all of those are SAHIH. In Bukharis sharha it says if Imam Bukhari (ra) has said before a sahaba: kalah or ravah, it means that Hazrat Imam Bukhari (ra) has stated that its sahih! Imam Suyuti(ra) has also stated this. Ibn Hajar(Ra) who wrote fathul Bari has also stated this in his commentary of Bukhari which is the greatest tafsir of Bukhari.

Sahih Bukhari is known to be most authentic book after the Quran. If Bukhari has statements of sahaba and tabieen without sanad and are all fabricated then how can it be the most authentic after Quran. Ibn Hajar has written that when Imam Bukhari states anything about a sahaba with kalah or ravah THEY ARE ALL AUTHENTIC with AUTHENTIC SANAD.

Imam Suyuti(ra) has written about the statements about ibn Abbas(Ra) and that Ali Ibn Talha sanads and states him first, and says that any sanad from Ibn Abbas(ra) through Ali Ibn Talha IS THE MOST SAHIH which was from Ali Ibn Talha and nowadays they say this is the worst Naudhobillah. He also states that the tafseer of Ibn Abbas(ra) has stated a lot of statements and the best ones are narrated from Ali Ibn Talha.

Imam Suyuti(ra) has stated about Ibn Hajar that he states that Ibn Abbas(ra) tafseer were available to Abu Saleh, and those were from Muaviyyah bin saleh who got them from Ali Ibn Talha narrated from Ibn Abbas(Ra). Ibn Hajar(ra) states that Imam Bukhari (ra) got the book of Abu Saleh and Imam Bukhari(ra) in sahih Bukhari has stated many countless things in Sahih Bukhari from this. They state Ali Ibn Talha did not meet Ibn Abbas(ra). Well Ibn Hajar(ra) states that people claim Ali Ibn Talha did not hear tafseer from Ibn Abbas(Ra) but also states right after that Ibn Abi Talha got the tafseer of Ibn Abbas(ra) either from mujahid or Saeed bin Zubair. Then he states that when I found out that Ibn Abi Talha got the tafseer of Ibn Abbas from such people, no concern was left.